Aristotles View of Slavery Essay -- Slave Slavery Aristotle Paper Ess

Born in the year of 384 B.C. Aristotle was seen as constituted for histime, for he regarded slavery as a natural course of reputation and confided thatcertain people were innate(p) to be slaves due to the f bit that their intellect lacked therational part that should rule in a human being However in certaincircumstances it is evident that Aristotle did not believe that all men who wereslaves were meant to be slaves. In his book Politics, Aristotle begins with the Theory of The Household,and it is here that the majority of his views upon slavery are found. With thebeginning of Chapter IV, Aristotles idea of slavery is clearly defined. Theinstruments of the household form its stock of property they are animate and pulseless the slave is an animate instrument, intended (like all theinstruments of the household) for doing, and not for productions. Thisdistinction amidst action and production, is based upon the visualizeing thatproduction is a course in which a result is desired beyond the immediate actof doing. Where as, the simple act of completing a task is identified asaction. Aristotle, who believed that life was action and not productiontheorized that slaves were instruments of life and were therefore needed to forma complete household. In fact Aristotle went as far as to study that a slave wascomparable to a tame animal, with their still contrariety in the fact that a slavecould apprehend reason. For he cogitate that a slave and animals only use wasto supply their owners with bodily help. At the end of the Theories of the Household, Aristotle explains howslaves are different from andy other types of people, in the sence that they arethe only class who are born into their occupation and become property of their get the hang. In examining this relationship we befall that he thought that whilemasters were the masters of the slaves, they still held a life other than thatof being master However, Aristotle believed that not only was th e slave aslave to his master, but the slave had no other life or purpose than belonging.From this consideration we begin to understand Aristotles views on therelationship between Master and Slave. At the beginning of Chapter V of the Theory of the Household, thedistinct role of master and slave is defined. There is a principle of rule and subordin-... ... Aristotle we find that he was a man of dandycuriosity, wisdom and ideas. Although his views on slavery seemed to hold trueto the times, he had numerous variations on the conservative norms and beliefs. Hehad believed that slavery was a just dust where both master and slave werebeneficial from this relationship. And with this he thought that by nature,certain people were born to be slaves, yet with these beliefs we find galore(postnominal)exceptions, where Aristotle allocates areas to describe those who by chancebecame slaves but in his opinion were born to be turn. And in such incidencewhere men born free were no t fit to be masters Aristotle explained how it wouldbe easier for the master to make a steward who was more adept at giving book of instructions to run the household and leave the master of the house to more responsible issues. We can only guess as to what made Aristotle believe that by the humansoul one could delineate whether or not a man was meant to be a slave or afreeman. And with his arguments we find that it was just as difficult for himto make that distinction as well. though it is not as easy to see the beautyof the soul as it is to see that of the body.