Issues - politics Essay Example for Free

Issues political sympathies EssayBoeing is one of the worlds best known manu situationures of aircrafts and so is Northrop Grumman who are the manufacturers of the airbus (Online News Hour, 2008). These are two go brands who are obviously competing in other areas of business and thitherfore any decision that involve them is cargo area back to raise considerable heat. It should b historied that twain are American companies though Northrop Grumman is partly owned by a French smart set.The nature of the contract which involves the security of America as a community is a matter of landal concern as it involves the give wayment of structures that could ensure the growth of security carcasss. Boeing and Grumman being business structures, such a big contract will obviously attract the interest of stakeholders from both sides. There are a number of key issues that postulate been brought out by the air force contracts which embroilMilitary contracts are a matter of cosmo s concern since it is in personate to protect the public, the resources apply in the phalanx contracts are derived from taxpayers and therefore the failure of such projects will be a emaciate of taxpayers money (Meyer, 2007). When McCain questioned the cost effectiveness in leasing planes that would otherwise have no values when their lease point in time was over his motive as the senator of Alabama was to ensure that the taxpayers money is channeled to useful projects.Furthermore, it is quite clear that the politicians have the ability to shoot down potenti totallyy useful deals due(p) to what Northrop Grumman executives refer to as expensive lobbying. governance is not always objective for there are situations where the stakes involved are shielded from the public and though the politics and viewpoints will be developed to suit the public, the real reasons are often ad hominem (Meyer, 2007). The inclusion of politics in such cases therefore has both advantages and disadvan tages and should be weighed carefully.Military procurance mediocre like any other public procurement scheme is prone to corruption, this was the case in the overlord contract that was brought to an end by Rumsfeld in 2006. Moreover, the big money involved in soldiers procurement processes act as a natural catalysts for corruption, therefore there is need to come up with a robust self regulated brasss that will ensure that such unethical practices are not in anyway included in the procurement process, the congress thus comes into the picture (Meyer, 2007).However, the political system is not known for its objectivity. In the cases, well-nigh of the reasons brought out against Northrop Grumman are flimsy and lack in objectivity. The fact that there will be lobbying is a clear sign that there will be loss in objectivity thus the decision will tend to favor groups that are be able to realize passable political support in the congress. Furthermore, the political system is one of the most corrupt system there is and the rationale in placing such a system to guard against corruption is questionable. i.Security Military procurement is a security critical matter (Meyer, 2007).The military is in fanny to ensure that the US is protect against its external enemies (Meyer, 2007). The seriousness with which the equipment tendering process is treated and the keen eye that the media watches the unfolding of such events relay the sizeableness placed on the military by the American people. The US is traditionally a fighting nation and the effectiveness of its military and equipments is one of the factors that has cemented its place as a world power.Military activities require superior levels of secrecy (Meyer, 2007). There is need to come up with effective equipments that can be used in varied situations. It should be noted that the arguments brought forward by the executives from both sides are centered around the transcendence of their products or the weaknesses of their opposite. The need for accuracy and well developed products that have the required reputation are several(prenominal) of the considerations that led to the two big companies making it to the final stage.The two companies are multinationals that have developed their brands all over the globe. It is noteworthy that when the US defense secretary cancels Boeings leases other nations still seek their products and are continues quest the products that have been labeled cost ineffective due to the reputation associated with their brand name. The importance of the security system is seen in the number of avenues and legislative systems that have been put in place to ensure that the process is through with(predicate) in a just manner (Krishnan, 2008).When the airforce declares that Northrop Grumman had won the bid for the airforce tankers, Boeing seeks redress through a different avenue Public accountability office. The office looks at their complaints and decides to freeze the process. It should be noted that it was the same office that had early in the decades frozen a billion dollar Boeing contract due to corruption charges. Even though there are systems put in place to ensure right(a) procedures in procurement of services and services, they can be outdone easily (Krishnan, 2008).The corruption allegations do in the sign Boeing contracts are a clear case where the protocols were overridden and it only came to realization a couple of months after the contracts had been signed. Furthermore, the fact that is was later found out that a different design could meet the specifications made by the airforce with reduced costs clearly show that even though the guidelines are put in place they are rarely noteed thus the need for a system or authority that will follow up on the recommendations and processes to ensure that they conform to the laid out guidelines.Some politicians have argued that the French tie beam of the airbus manufacturer is in itself a secu rity risk and therefore a purely American company should be promise. However, such a contracting systems will obviously lock out other open companies and therefore bring about questions on the integrity of the program line process. America has prided itself as being a liberalized nation, putting up measures that will lock out other qualified members on the basis of the compositions of its endueors is verso to the spirit of liberalization.Furthermore, being involved with a company that has partnered with a success story in atomic number 63 shields the tanker project from American economic downtimes though it effectively ensures that the project is affected by the occurrence in Europe. It is unrealistic to lobby for Boeing on the basis of confidentiality a company that has already shown traces of corruption cannot be trusted and n any can a company that is yet to prove its worth in the military sector.Therefore, system should be put in place to ensure that the projects are monito red and compared to some given standards if either is to be awarded the contract. ii. Stability The US is the father of capitalism and is therefore a country that is characterized by anxious competition between industry players who will always be on the look for additional cash in hand that will ensure their development into the future (Verkuil, 2007). On the day it was reported that Northrop Grumman had won the military contracts its administer prices rose by over 20 cents and Boeings shares fell by a couple of cents (CBS News, 2008).Note, the development in the contract procurement were being watched by investors who will then make their decisions on which company to invest in. Even though the large money involved in the transactions may be enough to lure investors into channeling their resources to a particular company, the reputation involved in being a company contracted with one of the worlds best airforce to develop its aircraft tankers is enough to cause significant chang es in the companys share index. beingness a capitalistic economy where entities gain at the expense of others, Boeing is bound to feel the pinch.The situation is made worse by the consideration that Boeing has a well developed reputation and therefore failure to promote a contract from a partner that it has associated with for a long time may be interpreted by the investors and its consumers in the wrong light. It may imply that the partner does not trust its capacity to develop superiors products or has doubts on its potential to remain productive. To bring the idea of reputation into perspective, legion(predicate) are of the opinion that the corruptions charges brought against Boeing may have affected its chances of successfully bidding for the contract (Verkuil, 2007).This holds considerable weight in that the military is not all about facilities but also reputation. The American people and its enemies will always keep a keen eye on the military and any transactions conducted with a partner who is proven to be corrupt will dent on its integrity thus its reputation. Conclusion Awarding a contract to a company to deliver services that are of public interest is a coordination compound process and will always involve the media and many other systems that have been put in place to ensure the safety of the public.Individual good and interest will always be central in the arguments brought forward by most people, this is more pronounced if the contract will significantly affect many people. It is therefore upon the government and the social systems to ensure that the systems put in place to ensure effectiveness of the bidding process are functioning properly and are robust enough to deal with the dynamism associated with such processes. If need be, changes must be instituted to ensure that the system are functioning.The products delivered must measure up to some predetermined standards to ensure quality and accountability. These measures and other quality man agement measures if well integrated into the bidding and execution of contracts that are of public interest will ensure that the public benefits in the best possible way. interchange Count 3271 ,Reference List CBS News (2008). Boeing Spurned On Huge Air Force Contract. Retrieved 13 October 2008 from http//www.cbsnews. com/stories/2008/02/29/business/main3894669. shtml? source=RSSattr=Business_3894669 Krishnan, A. (2008). War as Business Technological Change and Military Service Contracting. Aldershot Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. Meyer, J. (2007). functional in a War Zone Military Contractors. New York The Rosen Publishing Group. Online News Hour (2008). Boeing, Northrop Grumman impact Over Tanker Contract.Retrieved 13 October 2008 from http//www. pbs.org/newshour/bb/military/jan-june08/tanker_05-06. html. United States Government Accountability Office (2008). Statement Regarding the take in Protest Decision Resolving the Aerial Refueling Tanker Protest by The Boeing Company. Retrie ved 13 October 2008 from http//www. governmentexecutive. com/pdfs/061808cd1. pdf Verkuil, R. (2007). Outsourcing sovereignty Why Privatization of Government Functions Threatens Democracy and what We Can Do about it. New York Cambridge University Press.