Is Proof Needed in Order for God to Exist

Is Proof Needed in auberge for beau ideal to Exist At both(prenominal) point in vitality every person whitethorn question the universe of divinity. This could happen for a number of reasons. For example when we see bad things that occur around the institution we may lose our doctrine or wonder why does paragon whollyow these things to happen? As humans we entirely take aim a natural instinct to find answers to things that we ourselves house non explain or understand. Philosophers acquire sp give up a great amount of clip trying to prove or disapprove the innovation of god, hardly do we re totallyy need check that god exist?This is a tough question to answer because in that respect argon citizenry that would severalise yes and people that would say no. I myself devote never questi one(a)d the macrocosm of god cod to the fact that I feel handle the proof of his humankind is all around us. In this paper I will discuss the two views of this debut and which sid e makes the nigh valid literary argument for my personal beliefs. When you ask someone why they gestate in something most likely it is because they reach facts or some type of evidence as to why they call up what they do. If I say my dog bites and show you my arm with bite marks past you atomic number 18 more likely to suppose that my statement is true.The same thoughts pot be applied to the way some people believe and do not believe in god. Some people believe because they set out faith in the bible and that something more powerful than any other cart had to shit all the living things on earth. Others believe that everything in that is on earth could have evolved through science and on that pointfore none of the creations on earth be proof that god exist, these people are oft referred to as atheist. When people look at close an atheist they usually think that they worship the devil or are into some type of goddamn worship, but this is not the case.Simply puzzle atheists just do not believe in god and they believe that science played a severalise in the creation of the world and the things on it. The issue is why do we need proof that god exist and what type of proof is required to prove his existence? Many people, including Christians, wonder what proof is there that paragon exist. Is there really any concrete evidence to prove that an almighty creator exists? Or are we all beingness blinded by our faith and believing in something that may or may not be real, just so that we have hope that career is bring erupt after death. It is hard to imagine something that has always xisted, because as human all we know is life and death. To understand something that never began and will never end is hard to wrap our brains around that concept. If a person oppose the casualty of there being a god, thence any evidence presented passel be rationalized or explained away. It is like if someone refuses to believe that people have seen ghost or spi rits, then no amount of information is outlet to change their thinking. There are photographs of ghost and spirits, personal interviews from people who have encountered these beings, and even special equipment that shadower pick up various activities from these beings.Although this may be enough evidence for most people to some all this evidence would be worthless, because the person has already concluded that ghost or spirits do not exist. Of course many have attempt to prove paragons existence with rational arguments. Aquinas, Abelard, Anselm, Pascal, and Paley are a few that have attempted this. These approaches are of limited helpfulness, for though we can approach perfection with our reason and detect Him in nature, he cannot be fully grasped in this way. More importantly, these logical proofs for divinity fudges existence miss the point.What is the point? In my experience, most of those who doubt or deny gods existence do not do so because of firmly held philosophical c onvictions. They do so because of personal chagrin with God. Furthermore, Im suggesting that many of those who now perceive themselves as doubting or denying God for philosophical reasons, got where they are because they became personally disillusioned with God sometime in the past. To answer the question, Does God Exist? , a number of studies, articles, and re expect text file have been written.Two arguments that best attempt to prove the existence of God are the ontological argument by St. Anselm, and the cosmological argument by St. doubting doubting Thomas Aquinas. The second out of the five arguments provided in the cosmological argument is ground on experience and efficient cause. The efficient cause makes something happen, i. e. cause and effect, and this are the precedes for his argument. Aquinas argues that nothing in this world can uprise on its own, and moldiness have a first cause to create an intermediate cause, to create an ultimate cause and effect.Infinity make s it impossible to have a first efficient cause, but if there is no first cause, there would be no intermediate cause, and we would not exist. In the ontological argument, St Anselm provides an argument that is ground on logic. In order to understand his argument you must first harmonize that, if there is a God, he is that than which nothing great can be conceived. This is the premise for his argument. Without this premises his argument would fail. It must be agreed to, because it is a true statement. You do not have to believe in God in order to agree to these Premises.In agreeing to these first premises, St Anselm forces you to admit that God does exist in existence because his premises nurture his conclusion. St. Anselms hypothesis is that if God is that which nothing greater can be conceived, the idea of God must exist, if precisely in the mind. To exist in populace is greater than existing in the mind. Therefore God, being that which nothing greater can be conceived m ust exist in reality. All his premises support his conclusion, creating a valid and sound argument proving that God must exist. St.Anselms first form of the argument is that God is that than which none greater can be conceived. This means that no one can think of anything that is greater than God. The second idea is, it is greater to exist than not to exist. Next, St. Anselm describes two kinds of existence existence in the mind, and existence in real. Existence in the reality is very easy to believe, if you can touch, see, smell, hear, or taste something, in reality it exists. Existence in mind is harder to understand for some, because many people nevertheless believe what they see. Finally, St. Anselm defined God as the greatest being possible.A being who fails to exist is less perfect than a being that exist. Therefore, God must exist, necessarily. If the greatest thing that we can conceive does not exist than we can still conceive the greatest thing that does exist, and that wo uld be God. Philosophers, whether they are atheists, or believers have always been eager to discuss the existence of God. Some philosophers, much(prenominal) as St Anselm, and Rene Descartes, that formulated the ontological arguments attempt to prove Gods existence, believe that we have proven that God exist through our senses, logic, and experiences. ontological literally means talking about being and so in this case, that being is the existence or being of God. Ontological arguments all have ways to prove the existence of God. This argument is very important for apparitional believers, but has come under criticism from those who do not believe because they say that it is flawed. Immanuel Kant feels that we will never have the answer to this question due to our human limitations, and reason. Every painting has a painter and for every appropriate there is a writer. The same can be said about the creation of our world.Our world could not have just created itself. Thomas Aquinas, a Catholic Dominican monk, more clearly proves this point with the First endeavor argument. In this argument he says that there is a cause for everything but there cannot be an infinite amount of causes. There could only be a first, the intermediate, and then the last cause. This argument is very true and if God did not exist as the uncaused first cause then nothing else would make sense. The first and second premise is true because based on experience things are made or moved and things usurpt just appear out of thin air.The third premise is also true because at some point in time something had to be put in motion and there cannot just be an endless stream of causes. If God was taken out of the causes then we wouldnt exist here to daytime. Many still argue that neither one of these arguments prove Gods existence, because it is impossible for our reason to accept them. In Soren Kierkegaards argument, credit, not Logic is The Basis of Belief he argues that it is impossible to prove Gods existence because it is beyond our reason as human beings to do so.Kierkegaard classifies the word God under the word unknown. It is impossible for reason to know the unknown, so it is impossible to know, or prove God exists. Kierkegaard also claims that reason on its own does not attempt to prove God exists, he claims that it would be rattlepated to do so. It would be foolish to do so because reason is from existence, not towards it. Therefore if God does not exist, it would be impossible to prove he does, and if God does exist, because of our worldly limitations, it would be impossible to justify it as truth.Kierkegaard claims that the only way to argue Gods existence would be to assume Gods existence forrader creating the argument. In having faith, you have knowledge on what God should be like in order to fill the Gap of the unknown with ideas about God. Having Faith would make reason understand God. Doubt exists in the believer and the non-believer because it is beyond our reason to determine the truth of Gods existence. The Big Bang Theory in the main refers to the idea that the universe has expanded from a hot and dense measure up at some time in the past, and continues to expand to this day.My question is what put it there? Time could have not decided to one day say, I think Im going to create life in a thing called a universe. And magically particles come out of nowhere, more and more build up until its screaming hot, and then BANG Time begins and so does everything as we know it today. Something had to place it there. Something had to have planned out the whole process. Everything is too complex and precise to not have been created by an intelligent being. From beginning to present time billions of people from all around the world have believed and been convinced in the existence of a god.There are various forms of evidence displaying the belief of a god throughout history including biblical carvings, artistic creations, religious and poli tical conflicts, traditions, room decorator and the creation of the bible itself. Could one say with any sense of trustingness that the shared concept of the beliefs and actions of so many people living in different times with different realities be mistaken? It is extraordinary how disrespect the many different languages, customs, cultures, values, and lifestyles, the belief in God or a higher power is one of the few things that can unify all people.This is strong evidence contributing to mine and many others faith in the existence of God. The existence of god is something that has puzzled millions of people around the world. It crying families apart, and brings some together. There are a lot of arguments supporting the existence of god, but just as many denying the fact that he or it exists. Agnosticism is something that many people go by because it gets your mind to look for and assist you in deciding whether or not a divinity fudge exists. You need to find the answers with in yourself because only you can determine what truth and reality is.Not all questions may be answered, but it will allow you to form a true and concise belief. You cannot depend on someone or something else to satisfy your questions. You only live once and must search for the knowledge you desire. Some people are destined to succeed, and others are inflexible to succeed. If you seek the truth, you will find it. Logan, I. (2007). Whatever Happened to Kants Ontological communication channel?. Philosophy & Phenomenological Research, 74(2), 346-363. doi10. 1111/j. 1933-1592. 2007. 00021. x McCarthy-Jones, S. (2011).Seeing the unseen, hearing the unsaid hallucinations, psychology and St Thomas Aquinas. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 14(4), 353-369. doi10. 1080/13674671003745870 Mikolajczak, M. (2004). Is there proof for the existence of God?. National Catholic Reporter, 40(43), 5a Morse, D. R. (2011, October). Gods Existence Proof. Journal of Spirituality & Paranormal Studies. p. 181. Schumacher, L. (2011). THE baffled LEGACY OF ANSELMS ARGUMENT RE-THINKING THE PURPOSE OF PROOFS FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD. Modern Theology, 27(1), 87-101. doi10. 1111/j. 1468-0025. 2010. 01656. x