'Explore the theme of danger with reference to the extracts from ‘Heart of Darkness’ and ‘Blood River’\r'

'Joseph Conrad’s ‘ spirit of trace’ and Tim yetcher’s ‘ broth River’ two explore the theme of risk of infection through kayoed. This is achieved through Conrad and blunderer’s superior of lexis. The extract from ‘ core group of sinfulness’ is interpreted from chapter el stock-still. In this extract, Marlow and the rest of the clump of the steamboat ar creation attacked by the natives of the congou tea. The extract from ‘ kin River’ is taken from chapter ten (Bend in the River).In this extract, put to death describes how a child pickpocket is being attacked by an African mob. Both cleans ar written in 1st person, moreover ‘ mall of Darkness’ is assembly, whereas ‘ melody River’ is non-fiction. ‘ shopping center of Darkness’ was published in 1899 and ‘ strain River’ was published in 2007. The characterisation and memorial methods of the extrac ts are quite similar. In ‘Heart of Darkness’, Joseph Conrad gives a vivid type of how brutal the natives in the congo index of been: â€Å"… the arrows came in swarms. They might have been poisoned… ”This suggests to the indorser that in the congo, nobody is fully aware(p) of the harm they cause to others or cares approximately the consequences of their actions as long as it does non affect them and highlights the jeopardyous nature of the congou tea environment. In ‘ ocellus River’, Tim despatch gives a vivid image of violent deportment in the congou: â€Å"… the mob move and there was the boy, with his arms turn of eventsed slowly his masking”.This implies to the lecturer of how punishment is taken rattling seriously in the congou, even when it is a small child being involved and shows just how hazard is so common, it aims naturally to the natives of the congo. The contexts of the extracts are very divergent to each other. In ‘Heart of Darkness’, Conrad expresses to the reader that when the novel was published in 1899, life in the Congo was quite precarious, so when Marlow is attacked by the natives, while on the steamboat, it came as a surprise for him, although the peril was kn hold to him: â€Å"Arrows by Jove! We were being shooter at! ”The use of the excogitate ‘Jove’ emphasises to the reader that the attack came as a profane for Marlow and highlights the natives and their reaction to foreigners. In ‘Blood River’, execute expresses to the reader that at the moment, life in the Congo is opposite to what it was one-half a century ago, in the sense that lot know more because of travel, news, etc, plainly the Congo itself has become more brutal and insecure: â€Å"… I had witnesses numerous time during my stretch covering Africa…African mob nicety was a terrifying affair. ” This implies to the r eader that the Congo has changed dramatically over time and that military force is now a common thing to occur. The contextual factors of the two texts are very different as they were written in different times and so the historic backgrounds behind them are different. For example, when ‘Heart of Darkness’ was written, black men were called ‘niggers’ and it was thought to be normal to do so back then, but nowadays it would be an offence.In ‘Blood river’, Bucher mentions how violent mobs is a thing he has â€Å"witnessed numerous times”, but half a century ago was a very rare thing to control in the Congo. The genres of the texts are slightly different. ‘Heart of Darkness’ has a sense of danger and adventure throughout most of the novel: â€Å"The side of his head hit the wheel around twice, and the end of what appeared a long call on the carpet clattered round and knocked over a low camp-stool. ” This suggests to the reader that the novel has elements of danger in it and highlights the dangerous environment of the Congo.‘Blood River’ as well has the same elements of danger imprinted in the novel, but is presented in an informational smell: â€Å"In Swahili, toleka office ‘let’s go’, so shouting ‘toleka, toleka’, I urged my peddler to take note the Cohydro offices. ”This suggests to the reader that the genre of Butcher’s novel is adventurous, but is laid out in a factual manner that might not be true in the same way as Conrad’s exciting manner of expressing danger in the Congo. The social, object lesson and political agendas of both texts are very different in the sense that the authors treat certain situations different morally.In ‘Heart of Darkness’, Marlow shows that he has ethical motive when he navigates the steamboat to safety and tries to help his ally crew members: â€Å"He stood before the co arse opening, glaring, and I yelled at him to come back, while I straightened the sudden twist out of that steamboat. ” This suggests to the reader that Marlow is heroic as he saves many lives during the attack on the steamboat. In ‘Blood River’, however, Tim Bucher visualisems to abandon his moral standards even though to help raft in the Congo is considered pointless: â€Å"I was too preoccupied by my take in emergency to worry about the boy’s plight.”This too emphasises the futility of the crisis in the Congo and highlights the dangerous nature of the Congo environment. The features of linguistic communication change in the extracts are but slight. In ‘Heart of Darkness’, when Marlow and the steamboat crew are attacked by the natives, the language seems rude to a modern reader in the sense that the language used is no longer in everyday use, but sometimes used to impart an ex flavour: â€Å"Arrows by Jove!”The use of the word ‘Jove’ shows the reader that the novel is very superannuated as nowadays we would use the expression ‘Oh my God! ’ instead. In ‘Blood River’, Butcher frequently uses modern language when explaining the dangers of the Congo: â€Å"The boy’s mouth was exhaust and the side of his face was squashed straight off on the uneven concrete of the forecourt. It was a scene I had witnessed numerous times during my stint covering Africa.”The use of the coeval word ‘stint’, which means ‘ frolic’, suggests to the reader that Butcher is trying to exit more modern when explaining the brutality of the Congo and the dangerous nature of the Congo environment, and the familiarity of the word highlights that violence is quite popular in the Congo. It could also suggest that Butcher is at ease when discussing African violence as he has come crosswise so much of it in the past. In conclusion, both extracts of Ã¢â‚¬Ë œHeart of Darkness’ and ‘Blood River’ explore the theme of danger in similar ways, but have different effects on the readers.For example, Conrad fictional writing, although found on true events, could be seen by the reader as just fiction and dangerous aspects of the novel might not be as taken across as important as Butcher’s real expedition of the Congo and the dangers it contains. Both Conrad and Butcher have shown their own views of the Congo very carefully within the texts, to an extent where the reader can see the views of both authors as their own, and allowing them to see how dangerous the Congo environment really is.\r\n'